Later this week, in Alaska, U.S. President Donald Trump will meet face-to-face with Russian President Vladimir Putin to discuss one of the most intractable crises of our time — Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine. The announced agenda is ambitious: negotiate a framework for ending the war, possibly as the first step toward a ceasefire.
The timing and optics are deliberate. Trump wants to present himself as the dealmaker who can succeed where others have failed — the leader who brings “peace through strength” and does it fast. But the devil, as always, is in the details. And those details make this meeting a minefield.
Trump’s Goal: A Quick Win Through “Realism”
From Trump’s perspective, the fastest way to stop the bloodshed is to recognize “facts on the ground” — in other words, to accept that Russia retains control of the territory it has already seized, including Crimea and much of eastern Ukraine. In exchange, Putin would agree to halt further offensives, and the West might offer security guarantees and economic relief to Ukraine.
It’s a high-pressure, “take-it-or-leave-it” model: create a deal between Washington and Moscow first, then present it to Kyiv and Europe as the only viable path forward. The thinking is that Putin would pocket his territorial gains while the West declares a victory for peace.
The Built-In Problems
The plan has serious, perhaps fatal, flaws:
- Ukraine Isn’t at the Table – By structuring the Alaska talks as a bilateral U.S.–Russia summit, Trump risks sidelining the very country whose sovereignty is at stake. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has made it clear: *nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine*.
- Russia’s Track Record – In Georgia (2008), eastern Ukraine (2014–2015), and Syria (2016–2018), Moscow agreed to ceasefires mainly to regroup, rearm, and solidify its gains — not to make lasting peace.
- Weak Enforcement – If the deal lacks robust monitoring and automatic penalties for violations, Russia can probe and push the limits without meaningful consequences.
- Western Disunity – Forcing Ukraine to concede territory risks fracturing Western unity. Many European leaders reject any settlement that legitimizes territorial conquest, and public opinion in Ukraine is overwhelmingly against ceding land.
The Likely Outcome: A Pause, Not a Peace
Even if an agreement is signed, it’s far more likely to be an armistice in name only than a true resolution. Our analysis suggests that:
- The most probable outcome is a “frozen conflict” — small-scale fighting, periodic ceasefire breaches, and Russia consolidating its hold on occupied areas.
- The war’s core dispute — Ukraine’s sovereignty and borders — will remain unresolved.
- Russia will use any pause to reinforce defenses, rebuild stockpiles, and prepare for future moves.
- Ukraine, feeling pressured and sidelined, will quietly rearm and strengthen its alliances, waiting for a more favorable moment to push back.
If Trump’s plan demands territorial concessions, the result will likely be a breathing space for Russia and a bitterly resentful Ukraine — with much of Europe also frustrated at the precedent it sets.
The Peace the World Really Needs
The Bible shows us that true peace will not come through deals built on compromise with aggression. Compromises may silence guns for a time, but they do not remove the seeds of future war. Real, lasting peace will only come when a world leader emerges who is stronger than any human power — one who will rule not with political expediency, but with perfect justice.
That leader will be Jesus Christ at His return. Isaiah prophesied of Him:
“Of the increase of His government and peace there will be no end… to order it and establish it with judgment and justice from that time forward, even forever” (Isaiah 9:7, NKJV).
When Christ establishes His Kingdom, peace will not be negotiated on the basis of who holds what territory or who can extract the better deal. It will be enforced worldwide on the basis of God’s law, which ensures fairness, righteousness, and the protection of all peoples.
Realities on the Ground
The Trump–Putin meeting in Alaska may produce headlines about “ending the war,” but the realities on the ground — and the terms being floated — make a genuine resolution improbable. At best, the world may see a temporary reduction in hostilities. At worst, it will simply buy time for Russia to regroup and return to the fight.
Until the day Christ returns to impose peace with justice, the world will keep watching leaders attempt to negotiate their way out of wars — and keep learning, painfully, that human solutions can never match God’s plan for lasting peace.
Leave a comment